Comments on: CCM U+ Hockey Stick

By: kapanen

kapanen — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:19:03 +0000

I bought this anatomy version few weeks ago after my later ccm u+ cracked from the middle of blade. I really like this stick, it’s all i need! It’s mid flex is just made for me and it’s superlight. Stick has also really good puck-touch and stick handling is easy. I have got the 19 model blade which is good, but i would like to have little bit more curve. It’s great for saucers and wristers, but wouldnt recommed this to defence men who likes to take slapshots. Very good for wingers and snipers.

After 3 weeks this anatomy version started cracking from the heel towards the tip of the blade. So i sent it to warranty and i’m getting a new one to it’s place. Hope it will last little bit longer, becaude in the end this stick is awesome but it’s only problem is weak durability. Looks are also pretty unique and i kinda like ‘em.

By: Carson

Carson — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:56:36 +0000

This is a good stick for forwards, if you are a d-man, dont buy it. Gives you a nice wrist shot though.
ONLY BUY IT IF YOU ARE A FORWARD. NOT FOR SLAPSHOTS.

By: mason

mason — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:57:29 +0000

The u+ breaks pretty easy. but it is very light.

By: Snipes

Snipes — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:27:19 +0000

should I get this the SE16 or a one 95 stick um?? Pleez tell me i really want to know!!!!!!!

By: abdar sukmycok

abdar sukmycok — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:36:59 +0000

it is a very good stick but also pooey

By: Kirk

Kirk — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:14:39 +0000

Although this stick is very light, in comparison to what else is in the market. I have to say that the shot is great, there is a low kick point, so everything rises – wrists. snaps and slap shots all come off the blade quickly,smoothly and rise at a good rate. The feel of the puck while stick handling is good, versus some one pieces that have a tingy feel, and or bounce off the ice at times. All this said. It lasted two games, and snapped at the 6 – 12 inch mark above the blade. CCM replaced the stick in 3 weeks no less. All was well – however it broke again, same area again after 2 games. From a player who played Junior and College hockey that is now playing men’s league I need more durability and longevity on a purchase such as this.

By: Mason czaikowski

Mason czaikowski — Tue, 05 May 2009 19:33:30 +0000

I have had the U+ for a while now and i really like how strong it is. for how light it is. All of my passes and shoots seem a lot better. It is a great stick.

By: matt stoddart

matt stoddart — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:31:46 +0000

this stick is the best stick i’ve ever used!!!! i notised i scored more and my passes were more sharp! i sugest you buy one of these two!

By: hockey man

hockey man — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:13:14 +0000

warrior is the best stick

By: JTH

JTH — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:31:55 +0000

Contacted CCM customer service said they would NOT replace this stick whcih broke at the 32nd day (but was only used about 12 hours). Broke right at the U+ label on teh shaft also.

Steer clear of this stick and CCM due to their not standing behind their product.