Niklas Kronwall Hits Martin Havlat
July 21, 2009 by Tyler
Filed under Hockey Videos
UPDATE: With the recent hoopla surrounding Martin Havlat and the Chicago Blackhawks, I thought it appropriate to show some evidence as to why the Blackhawks might have opted to sign Marian Hossa instead of Havlat. Havlat has a history of injuries and this concussion received from Niklas Kronwall could have future consequences. In fact, while both players are relatively 1pt/game producers – Hossa has played 380 games over the past four seasons and havlat has played jut 190.
Niklas Kronwall laid a huge hit on Martin Havlat in Game 3 of the Western Conference final. Havlat was knocked unconscious momentarily as Kronwall stepped up from his blueline position to hit Havlat as he turned to exit the zone on the wing. Havlat did not return to the game.
Watching the review several times, you can see that Havlat did have the puck in his skates, did have his head down and Kronwall did, as all defensemen are taught from day 1 – stepped up and hit the winger exiting the zone with his head down.
Here is the video evidence.
The officials initially made no call on the play, but after consultation with the linesmen issued Kronwall a 2 minute minor, 5 minute major and a game misconduct for…interference.
Here is the portion of Rule 59 interference that refers to possession of the puck, which is the only way that this play could have been called under this section of the official rules.
Rule 59 – Interference- Possession of the Puck:
The last player to touch the puck, other than the goalkeeper, shall be considered the player in possession. The player deemed in possession of the puck may be checked legally, provided the check is rendered immediately following his loss of possession.
Some folks may argue that this could be considered charging. By the working definition, charging is usually called when the attacking player leaves his feet, but the official defintion in the rule book leaves the officals wide open to call a charge on almost any hit!
Here is the “official” definition of Rule 43- Charging:
43.1 Charging – A minor or major penalty shall be imposed on a player or goalkeeper who skates or jumps into, or charges an opponent in any manner.
Charging shall mean the actions of a player or goalkeeper who, as a result of distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner. A “charge” may be the result of a check into the boards, into the goal frame or in open ice.
Now if that doesn’t leave the interpretation of a call wide open for the officials, I don’t know what does! I’m not suggesting removing the rule from the book, but it certainly needs to be more well defined.
The NHL officiating saga in the playoffs continues as the inconsistencies abound from both on and off ice officials.







Jeff Cagle on Sat, 23rd May 2009 12:11 pm
I agree that this isn’t interference, but this isn’t a 100 percent clean hit. I think the argument could even be made that Kronwall deserved a major for charging since it was a hit to the head and it resulted in an injury.
I’ve broken down the hit frame-by-frame (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jcagle/3556171699/ and you can click through to see it bigger from there) and you can tell that in the second frame, which is the moment of impact, Kromwall’s right skate is already off the ice and he’s in an upward trajectory (leaving his feet). I know the argument has been made that Kromwall left his feet BECAUSE of the collision, but you can see that before Havlat’s feet are even out from under him Kromwall is already airborne by at least two or three inches.
Matthew Taylor on Sat, 23rd May 2009 12:47 pm
Nice article, As much as I look for any Redwing to do anything wrong, I can’t find anything here, he may have left his feet for a moment, but that could be from making contact. The first thing i was taught, was to never skate with your head down. This is what happens
Jamie Favreau on Sun, 24th May 2009 2:14 pm
The hit was clean in my opinion. You shouldn’t have your head down if you are on the ice. Especially during the playoffs just ask Umbergerer about having his head down.
Matt on Sat, 30th May 2009 10:22 pm
Yes, he left his feet because of the hit. He leaves his feet on *every* hit he makes. Kronwall is a head-hunter, and apologists for his dangerous style of play can’t hide from that fact.
Snipes on Fri, 10th Jul 2009 11:02 am
H didnt leave his feet!! Krowalls a tanker And that wasnt 100% clean as Jeff Cagle said but it was a perfect 10 on the Martin Havlat got owned scale!!! Nice Hit!!!!!