Customized NHL T-Shirts

March 19, 2010 by Tyler  
Filed under Hockey Collectibles

Montreal Canadiens Maurice *Rocket* Richard Vintage NHL Alumni T-Shirt

Click T-Shirt For Best Price

Pittsburgh Penguins Sidney Crosby NHL Player Name & Number T-Shirt (Black)

Click T-Shirt For Best Price

A hockey T-shirt is one of the easiest and affordable ways that hockey fans can show his or her support to their favorite team.

Just recently, I asked the NHL Digest Twitter followers what piece of apparel they were most likely to buy to support their favorite NHL team.  Very overwhelmingly, the response what a T-shirt featuring their favorite team’s logo.

The T-shirt is a classic way to support your favorite team, and obviously much cheaper than a jersey.  In fact, over the last couple of seasons, I’ve noticed more and more T-shirts with player names and numbers on the back – just like a jersey.

Buying A Hockey T-Shirt

Not surprisingly, the NHL shop has a huge selection of pre-printed  featuring current and vintage teams and players, like the Sidney Crosby Pittsburgh Penguins T-shirt and the Maurice Richard Montreal Canadiens T-shirt.  However, what is really cool is that they also have a tool allowing you to design your own customized hockey T-shirt!

The NHL Player Name & Number Reebok  T-shirts feature:

  • 100% Cotton team colored t-shirt
  • Team logo screened to front chest
  • Player name and number screen printed in puff print on back
  • Screen printed stitching effect on numbers to give it an authentic sewn look, just like a jersey.

Another cool fact about the Vintage NHL T-shirts is that a portion of all T-shirts is donated to the NHL Alumni Fund.  If you’re anything like me, you think the old time hockey guys deserve every penny. Especially since the average player didn’t make anywhere near what players make today – even adjusted for inflation.

I think I’ll head over and get myself a customized Mats Naslund #26 Montreal Canadiens T-shirt!

Get Your Customized NHL T-shirt!

Click Here: NHL Shop Custom T-Shirt

Fantasy Hockey League Tips!

August 19, 2009 by Tyler  
Filed under Hockey Columns

The Strategy

Fantasy hockey league season is almost upon us once again and it is time to scour the rosters of each team in search of that elusive perfect fantasy hockey combination.

There are many different ways to score fantasy leagues and just as many, if not more, strategies to utilize when selecting players for your fantasy hockey team this season.

Now, before you go blindly into your draft selecting Crosby, Malkin, Ovechkin, Lidstrom, and Brodeur, be sure to fully understand how your draft is scored and how many players from each position that you are required or allowed to choose.

Understand The Scoring System

During the 2004-2005 season I participated in one fantasy league where 1 point was awarded for each goal or assist. There were no restrictions on the number of players from each position and players could be selected by more than one person in the draft. Each draft entrant was required to select any 20 players in the NHL for their team.

The key in the scoring of this draft was that goaltenders received 5 points for a win and 10 points for a shutout. So, guess what one enterprising guy did? You got it… He selected 20 goalies! He was well within the rules set out by the draft and was all but guaranteed to get at least 5 points per night. There were a few nights when he racked up 40-50 points and needless to say, he won the draft hands down.

Of course, each league is scored differently but it is always important to understand the rules. It is especially important in a situation where each NHL player can only be selected by one team in the fantasy league.

Don’t Forget The Goalie!

In this scenario, it is almost always the case where the top scoring forwards will be selected first. However, it has been my experience that when points are given for goaltender performance, it is always necessary to select the best goaltender available within the first two picks of the draft.

There are years where a forward of defenseman may surprise everyone and rack up a tone of points. However, it is very rare that a goaltender comes out of nowhere and wins substantially more games than in previous years, unless the goalie has switched teams in the off season.

Yes, Martin Brodeur is a great goaltender, but his team in New Jersey has definitely helped him achieve an extraordinary amount of wins and shutouts over the past decade. The same holds true for any of the Detroit goaltenders. These are skilled goaltenders, but fantasy players earn points, in the majority of leagues, for wins and shutouts.

In rare cases, there may be points awarded for save percentage. In this case you may want to select someone like Niklas Backstrom, who typically faces a lot of shots. In any event, picking a goaltender early in the draft that has a strong defense in front of him, is traditionally a good move.

What About The Goons?

When points are awarded for penalty minutes in a fantasy league, it is highly unlikely that this is the only category that points are awarded for. Therefore, taking Daniel Carcillo just to own the penalty minute category probably isn’t a good idea; unless you can pick him up in the last round.

As we know, points are typically awarded in fantasy leagues for goals and assists, so one must take that into consideration when selecting players when attempting to earn a few penalty minute points. So who should you choose?

According to last season’s statistics, good choices for a player who spends some time in the sin bin, but also contributes offensively are David Backes and Scott Hartnell. I have surprised many other fantasy players over the years by selecting this type of a player in the early rounds of a fantasy draft. More often than not, this strategy has paid off in the end.

This is especially rewarding when your “penalty minute pick” has an especially good offensive year. Milan Lucic is a player in this category that I believe has the potential for more offensive upside. This might make Lucic worthy of an early-mid round selection, while still padding that penalty minute category.

You are now prepared to go out and draft an unbeatable fantasy hockey team!

Don’t forget to drop us a note during the season to tell us how you are doing in your fantasy league!

Thoughts on the Cup Finals

June 15, 2009 by Kyle  
Filed under Hockey Columns

Sidney Crosby hoists the Stanley Cup

Stanley Cup Thoughts

The 2008-09 season has come to an end, and I think it’s safe to say that the quality of this year’s playoffs already has us salivating for the 2009-10 season.
I know I’m already excited.

I’m still trying to digest how remarkable this Stanley Cup final was. Consider the following facts and storylines:

Marian Hossa, last year with the Penguins, defects to the Red Wings because he felt they represented his best chance to win a Cup. He spurned a 7 year, 50 million dollar offer from the Penguins to win the Cup. I respect the decision to put the Cup first, even though it backfired. It was not a horrible choice as he came within 1 game of his goal, but he still must feel pretty awful right now. That said, he was invisible at best in the finals. He had a chance to have an impact on his own fate and he dropped the ball. Speaking of dropping the ball, did Tomas Holmstrom even play in this series? I can’t recall ever hearing his name. He’s aged quickly after taking so much abuse in front of the net over the years.

Sidney Crosby becomes the youngest captain at age 21 to win the ultimate prize. Lemieux was 24, Gretzky was 23. This kid has taken heat from all over the place, from players on the ice, members of the media and especially fans. He’s now vindicated. I’ll go out on a limb and say that he’s just fine with Ovechkin being the most exciting, prolific player in hockey, and he’s doubly fine with teammate Evgeni Malkin being the top scorer and playoff MVP. He’s a Cup champ and the Pens would not have gotten so far without him. There should have been a lot of crow eaten and humble pie served this weekend.

- The Red Wings were virtually unbeatable at the Joe Louis Arena. 11-1 record. A lock to win game 7, right? Wrong.

- The home team was 12-2 in game 7 Stanley Cup finals history. Don’t tell the Penguins that. The home team is now 12-3.

- The Penguins were the first team in since the Habs in the beginning of the 70′s to win the Cup after losing the first 2 games on the road. Raise your hand if you thought it was over when the Pens went home 0-2. Everyone thought their opportunity to jump on the Wings would have been in the first 2 games when they were on 2 days rest after a punishing Conference final against the Blackhawks. Instead, the Wings showed that they had plenty of fight left in them. What this meant for the Penguins is that they had to win 4 of the next 5 games against Detroit, with at least 1 win coming on the road. Never before have the words “you’re not in trouble until you lose on home ice” carried more weight.

Marc-André Fleury. What can you say about this guy? Here’s another guy who took heavy criticism for not winning the big one. From the moment he gave up the chance to win the gold medal in the junior championships a few years back, people said he’d be a decent goalie, but his legacy would be good, but nothing to show for it. Well guess what? Now he’s shed that title, and has taken on the title of “big time goalie”, “CAN win it all” and he’s also probably earned himself an invite and a serious look for the 2010 Canadian Men’s Olympic Team. My lasting image for this Cup finals will be Fleury’s last-second (literally!) save off of Nik Lidstrom. If there was ever a bigger, more important, more clutch save in Stanley Cup history, I’d like to know about it.

- In the Wings’ crease, there’s no more doubt about Chris Osgood. He had a bad (with gusts up to mediocre) regular season, but he elevated in the playoffs and probably would have won the Conn Smythe if the Wings had won. That probably would have solidified his standing as a hall of fame goalie.

- Did any role player have more impact on the outcome of a series than gritty Max Talbot? He’s going down not only in Pittsburgh as a folk hero, but his name will be forever remembered in HOCKEY history as the unsung hero who delivered on hockey’s biggest stage under the most adverse conditions. If the Red Wings had won the series, we’d be talking about Dan Cleary today, and not Max Talbot.

- If before game 7 you had told me that the Penguins would have scored 2 goals, and would play over half the game without Crosby, I’d have told you that the Pens had no chance of winning on the road. And no, this is not an opportunity for Crosby haters to say that he is overrated because the Penguins won the most important game without him. That’s a lazy and hollow argument.

- No breakdown would be complete without giving the coaches their due. Dan Bylsma rode in mid-season after the overdue firing of Michel Therrien and totally turned around the fortunes of his team. He deserves a huge amount of credit for the speed and effectiveness he’s had on this young roster. Mike Babcock also has the mantle of best coach currently in the game. He needs to be behind the bench for team Canada in Vancouver 2010. Considering the injuries and fatigue that his players had, he also gets a big round of applause.

Not to make this all about the Penguins, because the Red Wings are still a damn fine hockey team that simply ran out of steam. Injuries, age and fatigue obviously caught up to them as the series wore on. In retrospect, they needed a win in game 3 or 4 to put the series out of reach but fell just short. I suppose you can’t reason or argue with destiny. That being said, the Red Wings have been the NHL’s gold standard for 15 years now and there’s no reason to think they can’t be back again next season. Their core will be back, and guys like Darren Helm and Justin Abdelkader showed that they are ready to step in to crucial roles that the likes of Draper and Maltby filled so admirably for years. They have the best coach in the league, the best GM, and more than a couple future hall of famers within their ranks. They’ll be a force for years to come.

If there was any ugliness to the series, it was post-game in game 7 where Kris Draper called out Crosby for not shaking hands. It smacks of sore loser talk and it was frankly unnecessary. Crosby, despite what many think, is a very classy player and is well versed in hockey history and protocol. Let’s please also keep in mind that at the very worst, Crosby is still a 21 year old who may have gotten caught up in the moment. There is no reason why Crosby would have intentionally snubbed the Red Wings.He’s much better than that.

In my prediction for the Cup finals, I said that Pittsburgh would win in 6 games. So I was off by one game. My underlying thought was that the torch is being passed to (or taken by) hockey’s next great team. With Crosby, Malkin, Staal, Fleury and a few others all under contract for years to come, the Penguins are poised to remain great and be the team to be beat for years to come, if they can navigate cap issues properly. Perhaps they need to trade one of their big 3 away for future assets (Staal?) Shades of the Islanders turning the reigns over to the Gretzky/Messier Oilers in the mid-80′s, with Crosby and Malkin leading the way if things go their way.

Please leave your thoughts below on what you thought of these classic finals. With the draft just under 2 weeks away and free agency at the beginning of July, we’ll need to keep the hockey chatter going until then!

Conference Final Impressions & Predictions for Cup Finals

May 28, 2009 by Kyle  
Filed under Hockey Columns

2008-2009 Stanley Cup PlayoffsConference Final Impressions

I don’t know if these conference finals were all that fans expected them to be, but they have sure paved the way for what promises to be a terrific championchip series.

Carolina (6) vs Pittsburgh (4)

I suppose I’m glad to say that I had this series mostly right. I thought the Pens would be too much up front, and they were. Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin were a 2-man army that completely dismantled what was left of the Hurricanes. I thought Carolina would have had a little more juice left, but Eric Staal had hit empty after his 7 game marathon with Zdeno Chara. And needless to say, if Staal is not bringing his A game every night, the Canes just don’t have the depth to compete, no matter how much magic they may have, or how much the hockey gods were smiling on them. The only hope they had was for Cam Ward to be utterly spectacular, but he was shelled in games 2 and 3 and may have lost all confidence. It even looked as though his teammates knew that their run was over. Let’s remember that they were an overachieving team that went through 2 grueling 7-game series with the Devils and Bruins, neither of which they were expected to win. A tip of the hat to the Hurricanes for a good run this season, but they were soundly beaten by a team that looks possessed right now, especially Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin . Suddenly the Habs fan in me doesn’t feel so bad. A team was swept in more dominating fashion than the Canadiens were.

 

Chicago (4) vs Detroit (2)

What can be said about the Red Wings? in my lifetime I don’t think I’ve seen such a complete and competent team. They simply do everything right, even with Pavel DatsyukNik Lidstrom and Draper out of the lineup. Marian Hossa stepped up in games 4 and 5 to lead the offensive charge in the absence of Datsyuk. Chris Osgood is proving that he can indeed be a clutch goalie, with a huge performance in game 5. From top to bottom, the Red Wings get it. They know their roles well, they know how to win and they are smarter than any team out there. I salute the young Blackhawks for their tremendous season. Patrick KaneJonathan ToewsPatrick SharpKris Versteeg and Martin Havlat  will be a formidable core for a long, long time. And they’re supported with tons of other great young talent on the blue line that will ensure Chicago’s restablishment on the hockey map. Next season the Red Wings may not be so lucky, but then again, when have the Wings ever depended on luck for their success?

 

Stanley Cup Final Predictions

 

Ready for round 2? What a difference a year makes. A year ago these same 2 teams were about to face off in the Cup finals. The NHL’s Golden Boy was standing at the brink of immortality, but unfortunately for Pittsburgh, they were guilty of watching the Red Wings more than they played them, otherwise things may have been different. Still, they pushed the Wings to 6 games and managed to make it interesting, but I don’t think anyone outside of Pittsburgh really thought they’d be knocking off the Wings.

 

Fast forward to June 2009. What’s changed? For starters, the Penguins now have the experience of having been there. They won’t be caught admiring the Red Wings smoothness this year. Their roster has also been significantly turned over: Marian Hossa is now on the other side, but they have brought in Ruslan Fedotenko (who has a cup ring), veteran scorers Bill Guerin and Miroslav Satan , the effective Chris Kunitz and the pesky Matt Cooke . More importantly, Crosby, Malkin, Staal and Fleury, the nucleus of this team is another year older, another year better and another year hungrier. Oh, and did I mention that aside from Sergei Gonchar ’s wobbly knee (which he still manages to play effectively on), the Penguins are remarkably healthy for this time of year.

 

I’m not going to dismiss the Cup champs so easily. They were my picks to reach the Cup finals from the start, so I’m not surprised they’re here now. Year after year I wonder when this team will finally run out of steam, but they never do. They always reload, they always rebound and they’re always in the championship conversation. The issue for the Red Wings this year will be their health. Their captain, and best defenceman Niklas Lidstrom is hurt, and at 38 years of age, may not heal so quickly as he once did. Pavel Datsyuk is also hampered with a nagging injury that has limited his production this spring. Kris Draper, who always brings leadership and shut-down ability is also banged up. Nevertheless, guys like Dan Cleary , Darren Helm , Valtteri Filppula and Johan Franzen are always there when the cards are down on the table. They provide the “unsung hero” goals that the Red Wings seem to have lived off of this playoff year.

 

If anyone was paying attention, they’d notice that the 2-man army of Crosby and Malkin was only improving as the playoffs wore on. No team, not even the Red Wings can match these 2 right now. They’re on a mission and if there’s a team that may be able to limit their damage, it’s the Red Wings and their team play concept. Not to be outdone, rookie coach Dan Bylsma has the Penguins playing a very strong brand of team defense. Outside of Gonchar, the rest of the Penguins defense corps is mostly no-names who keep it simple and move the puck to their unstoppable forwards. If the Wings can manage to break down their defense, they will still need to beat Marc-André Fleury, who was rock-solid against the (depleted) Hurricanes team. Fleury also managed to be the difference in the opening series against the Flyers.

 

In the end, I believe this will boil down to how much further Crosby and Malkin can continue to dominate. Can they complete their mission? If they continue at the rate they’re going, we will have new Cup champs. If they are matched by the Red Wings stars, or if the Wings manage to reduce their effectiveness at all, we will see the first repeat since the same Red Wings last did it from 96-98.
I believe we are in for another long series, but this one will be different. The Penguins won’t be star struck and may be poised to jump on the champs early in the series. The Wings are much older and are only getting 2 days rest between series. Is that enough to refocus, recharge and heal up before the Cup finals? Time will tell. The Wings have been through this before and I’m sure the focus will be there. Will their legs follow? Can Osgood stop the dynamic duo? He may need to be the Wings best player if they’re to repeat, and I’m not so sure he can do it.

 

As with all great players, they want the ultimate prize. And they usually find ways to get their hands on it. I’m sure Sidney Crosby will be more than happy to let Ovechkin win the Rocket Richard Trophy, the Hart Trophy, and any other individual accolade that there is. But come late June at the awards ceremony, Crosby will desperately want to present himself as a Cup winner. If he’s felt stung by being supplanted as the league’s best player, he’ll bring the hardware to prove everyone that they are wrong, as if his performance head-to-head with Ovechkin in the 2nd round was not enough already.

 

Another storyline to follow is that of Marian Hossa’s. A year ago the Penguins gave away an awful lot to get him out of Atlanta. Obviously they fell short of their goal, and Hossa subsequently left as a free agent…to Detroit. It’s either going to prove to be a good decision for Hossa, or it will haunt him forever. Maybe he will be our generation’s Marcel Dionne, a great player who could not win the Cup.

 

When the smoke clears I see Pittsburgh winning in 6. I see Shades of the mid-80′s, as the young Oilers fell once to the mighty Islanders, then faced them again the next year and beat them to win their first cup. The rest is history, as we all know the Oilers went on to become the last true hockey dynasty. I believe the stars are aligned for the Penguins to climb the mountain and establish themselves as the league’s best team.

 

No matter what, I can’t see how this will end up being a boring Stanley Cup final. This is great for hockey and great for 2 markets that have their own struggles.

 

Let’s drop the puck! Saturday can’t get here fast enough!

2nd Round Impressions and Conference Finals Predictions

May 15, 2009 by Kyle  
Filed under Hockey Columns

solongbruinsRaise your hand if you think this is the best hockey you ever seen? Outside of International hockey which tends to always be this good, I can’t recall a playoff year being so full of exciting end-to-end hockey. For years we were used to guys “water skiing”, chipping their way through the playoffs with stifling defense and sluggish flow.

Not this year. And it’s not likely to start any time soon.

 
Thoughts on the Second Round

Boston vs Carolina 

The Hurricanes have made me, and I suspect most of us look silly twice now. I don’t know if many predicted them to beat the Devils (though I did), and I think even fewer predicted them to beat the Bruins (I did not). I don’t know what it is about this team, but it sure feels like they’re a team of destiny, doesn’t it? How can you not like this team? From Paul Maurice and Ron Francis , to Eric Staal and Cam Ward , what’s not to like? I guess if you’re a Bruins fan, you don’t like Scott Walker very much now…the guy who kayoed Aaron Ward , and then kayoed the Bruins entirely . I thought the Bruins played well enough to win game 7, but they slipped in games 3 and 4, which cost them dearly. The Bruins have never overcome a 3-1 series deficit, and that history will continue for at least 1 more year. I feel bad for Tim ThomasClaude Julien , and Aaron Ward, but the Bruins had a great year and should be back next year to challenge again. The questions will begin to circle around Tim Thomas now, especially now that he has a fat long-term deal. He’s now 0-2 in playoff game sevens and he’ll be dogged by that until he wins one.

Pittsburgh vs Washington 

What can you say about this series that hasn’t been said already? A series featuring several of the games brightest stars, highlighted by Sidney Crosby and Alex Ovechkin . This series was hyped as a showdown between these 2 stars as if they were the only ones playing, and for long stretches, it seemed like they were the only 2 doing anything. Crosby had 13 points in the series while Ovechkin had 14. But in the end, Crosby was there in game 7 while Ovechkin seemed to fade after being robbed by Marc-André Fleury early in the first period. That save was the turning point of the game. It looked like this series was going to be a quick one after Washington took a 2-0 series lead, but the Penguins battled back on home ice and won 4 of the next 5 games, which many thought would be next to impossible. Again, the old adage of “you’re never in trouble until you lose on home ice” proves true. As for the Crosby/Ovechkin feud, I think it’s time to say that Crosby gets the edge. Sure Ovechkin has the flair and the personality – no debate there. But at 21, Crosby has already been to the Cup finals and is 1 series away from doing it again. He brought it and delivered big time in game 7 when it mattered most, and without a doubt understands the team game and how to use his teammates better than Ovechkin does. The poignant image in this series for me is when Crosby stole the puck from Ovechkin, streaked down the ice and beat Jose Theodore to seal the series. If that was not the series in a nutshell, what is?

Detroit vs Anaheim 

This series seemed to be littered with blown calls, missed calls, weird brawls involving lightweights, stars and mismatches and of course, controversy. In the end I believe everything balanced out and the better team won, though it took longer than it ought to have taken. If not for the heroics of Jonas Hiller , this series is over in 5. Even with Pavel Datsyuk and Tomas Holmstrom sound asleep this playoff year, the Wings are still getting consistent scoring from “the Mule” Johan FranzenHenrik ZetterbergNik LidstromMarian Hossa and Jiri Hudler . Anaheim seemed only to be able to go as far as Hiller and Getzlaf could take them. Niedermayer and Pronger are not the players they used to be, nor is Teemu Selanne . It may be time for a changing of the guard in Anaheim, as many of their key veterans are unrestricted free agents.

 
Vancouver vs Chicago 

Who says young teams can’t win this deep in to the year? The Blackhawks are the youngest team in the league and are impressively showing everyone that you can’t lose if you don’t know what losing is. Call them the Canada killers, but they’ve knocked out the 2 Canadian representatives in the Western Conference in impressive fashion. They rattled and eventually shredded Miikka Kiprusoff , and did the same to Roberto Luongo . Speaking of Luongo, what a bad time for the team captain to play his worst hockey of the year. For a guy that everyone expects to be named Canada’s #1 goaltender at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, he sure didn’t play like he can handle the pressure (In fact, neither did Brodeur , which begs the question – is Cam Ward the best Canadian goaltender in the game right now? One thing is for sure today, if Luongo is named Team Canada’s #1 guy, it will be in large part due to the politics of having the home town guy between the pipes. Hopefully Team Canada General Manager Steve Yzerman and the coaching staff can see through this and make the correct call. It may end up being Luongo come next year, but right now it’s not.).

I wonder how the Canucks feel today about bringing in Mats Sundin , as he did not quite live up to expectations, despite respectable playoff stats. It’s evident that skipping training camp hurt him, and father time is catching up. Will he be back next season? Will the Canucks want him back? If the Sedins leave, they may be forced to bring him back just to keep them competitive. The rest of the Canucks seemed not to be able to raise their game in the playoffs. Steve BernierRyan Kesler and Pavol Demitra were not able to match the skill and production of the Hawks. Going back to the Hawks, there’s no shortage of extremely talented kids that can flat out get the job done. From Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews, to Patrick SharpKris Versteeg and Martin Havlat , the scoring is there in spades. And with role players like BurishByfuglienBollandLadd, and Sammy Pahlsson, the sandpaper and intangibles are there too. The defense is able, and more importantly, willing to take abuse and give it out. Joel Quenneville is to be commended for what he’s done with this collection of youngsters. It’s clear that the firing of Denis Savard so early in the year was the right move, after it left so many shaking their heads.

Predictions for the Conference Finals

Carolina (6) vs Pittsburgh (4)

I don’t want to make the mistake of disrespecting Carolina again, since they seem to be proving just about everyone wrong, but I have a tough time making a case for them to beat the Penguins. I can easily say that fortune is smiling on the Canes and that will somehow carry them through the series, but I’m not going to do that. I think that the Penguins have the 2 best, or at least 2 of the 3 players in the league. And in Crosby’s case, he looks as though he’s just warming up. The Canes don’t have the defense to contain all of the Penguins up front talent…do they? Paul Maurice will have to roll lines because he won’t win many matchup battles. On the other hand do the Penguins have the necessary defensemen to lock up Eric Staal? Does it matter? Staal asserted himself quite well against Norris candidate Zdeno Chara , so maybe it doesn’t matter who the Penguins run out there. On the Penguins front, Sergei Gonchar came back for game 7, and had a positive contribution in the outcome. Will his knee be able to last for whatever amount of hockey is left in their season? I expected this to be another fast-paced series, with the Penguins talent being the difference. Though I will NOT be surprised to see the Canes advance. After all, Cam Ward STILL has never lost a playoff series (6-0), including a sparkling 4-0 record in 7th games. If that’s not clutch, I don’t know what is. Even after being seemingly rattled after the Bruins dominated games 5 and 6, he came back with a stellar effort in game 7. I don’t want to keep betting against this guy, but I also don’t want to bet against Sidney Crosby on a mission. The Canes are certainly battle tested, with both series this year going down to the wire in 7 games (to the last minute vs the Devils and OT vs the Bruins). That’s invaluable experience, but begs the question – how much do they have left in the tank. This is a team that will heavily rely on Staal to carry the mail offensively, as they have in both series to this point. Can he do it again? Maybe, but not quite enough.

Pittsburgh in 6 (though if it gets to a 7th game, I can’t help but think the Canes will win).

Chicago (4) vs Detroit (2)

Let’s hope that this original six matchup provides better entertainment than the Canadiens / Bruins series, which was as anticlimactic as it gets. In this matchup, we have division rivals, original six rivals, defending champs & league’s oldest team (Detroit) against the upstart, youngest team in the league with their sights set on the prize (Chicago).

This series has major potential for fireworks and drama, the same way the Penguins / Capitals series gave it to us. I think a lot of people are waiting for the air to slip out of the Blackhawks balloon, but so far it has not happened. People thought that the rougher, bigger defense of the Flames and Canucks would punish and smother the smallish, inexperienced Hawks forwards. But the Hawks have proven that they are more than up to the challenge. They’ve fought back and dished out as much as they took. On the flip side, the Red Wings do not play a bruising type of hockey. They play smart, they move the puck and they are disciplined. They are led by guys with multiple cup rings, guys who have been here many times and know precisely what it takes to get the job done. How much more can Quenneville get out of his troops? For Detroit, Mike Babcock also has a tremendous amount of experience at this time of year and can handle anything. So far he’s beaten a Columbus team that rode an extremely hot Steve Mason in to the playoffs, he’s beaten an Anaheim team that wanted to grind the Wings to a halt, and now they’re playing a Hawks team that will try to skate and finesse them in to the ice.

It’s time to throw the inexperience argument out the window. The Hawks don’t care. Whether they are right in thinking this remains to be seen. I’m calling the talent on both sides as a draw. In my mind this series will boil down to Osgood vs Khabibulin and how well their defensemen can contain the skill. I think now is the time we will see Datsyuk and Holmstrom wake up and make their contribution. Notice has been served however, that the Chicago Blackhawks are for real, and they’re going to challenge Detroit for the division title starting from game 1 next season. But for now, the champs will continue their march towards a rare Stanley Cup repeat.

Detroit in 6.

I believe we are looking at a rematch of last year’s Stanley Cup Finals, which should be even better this year. The Penguins are a better team, and the Wings…well, when aren’t they great?

As an interesting side note, 3 of the 4 coaches still standing were hired DURING the season after the previous coach had been fired (Therrien, Laviolette, Savard). As a copycat league, where teams try to mimic the Stanley Cup champ, I wonder if we will see a rash of firings next season as teams try to capture lightning in a bottle?

Please leave your thoughts and predictions below!

Up Close and Personal With Dan Rosen of NHL.com

December 27, 2008 by Tyler  
Filed under Hockey Interviews

This week NHL Digest was honored to have interviewed hockey journalist, Dan Rosen, from NHL.com.  Dan grew up in Northern New Jersey and studied journalism at the University of Arizona.  He worked at various papers as journalist for 7 years prior to joining the NHL last October.  Please enjoy getting to know the man behind the keyboard at NHL.com!

Do you think Sundin has a shot at winning a Stanley Cup with the Canucks? And, how do you think the Canucks feel about being Sundin’s second choice to the Rangers?

I’ll actually answer the second part first. I don’t think the Canucks feel much, if anything in regards to that because it has never been stated as a fact that Sundin did in fact favor the Rangers over them. I know it can be construed that way because Sundin didn’t immediately take a huge sum of money from Vancouver on July 1 and that he waited and waited and waited to find out what the Rangers plans were going to be to acquire him. Believe me, I see that side of the argument. However, why would the players on the Canucks care? They have him now and they know Sundin wouldn’t be there if his heart wasn’t in it.

In a way, he has a lot to prove, which leads to the first part of your question. Yes, I think he has a shot at winning the Cup with the Canucks. You always have a shot if Roberto Luongo is your goalie. That being said, I can’t sit here today and tell you that he will win the Cup with Vancouver. I still think the Red Wings are the favorite. I mean, how can they not be? I do think Vancouver is better off with Sundin than without him, which of course means he has a shot.

Did the Dallas Stars do the right thing by ridding themselves of Sean Avery? And, do you think Sean Avery will ever play in the National Hockey League again?

The answer to both questions is yes. For one, I think it was pretty obvious that Avery had a negative influence on the players in that dressing room. You have some established vets in there like Mike Modano, Brenden Morrow, Stephane Robidas, Brad Richards, Sergei Zubov, Marty Turco, Jere Lehtinen and Mike Ribiero. They didn’t need or want the sideshow that Avery brings wherever he goes. So, by taking Avery out of the mix, the Stars can now become a close knit group again. It’s showing. They beat Toronto, 8-2, in their last game before Christmas. Prior to the holiday, they had gone four straight without losing in regulation. I see it turning around there.

And, secondly, yes I do think Avery will find his way back into the League, probably next year provided the Stars can figure out what to do with his contract. I do not think he will play in Dallas and it will have to be a team in need of a jolt or a spark. I’m thinking Columbus, Atlanta, the New York Islanders, if you can believe that, or perhaps the Colorado Avalanche. I can’t say for sure this will happen. I do wonder if and when he comes back if he will put on the good boy behavior or will he be the same Sean. If he toes the line, I’m fine with that. Bad boys can be good for the game, too. If he jumps over the line, he needs to be disciplined. There’s no place in the sport for that.

What is your opinion of Sidney Crosby’s “low blows” on Boris Valabik of the Atlanta Thrashers? Do you think he should be punished by the league?

Tough question. Is it heat of the moment, wailing away with no disregard? Or, was it pre-meditated? I’m going to have to say it was heat of the moment and Crosby was wailing away with no disregard, but that doesn’t make it any better. There are certain body parts that should be, um, off limits. I think we know that is one of them. Every guy can attest to that. Every girl should attest to that or guys should run away from them. I don’t think Crosby should be punished by the League for the infraction, but I do agree with the roughing penalty. He was the third guy in to the melee. I don’t like it. It hurts to watch it. But, is it finable or suspendable? I’m not too sure about that.

Who do you think is the favorite to win the Calder trophy in 2008-2009?

Derick Brassard was at or near the top of my list for most of the season until now. Poor guy dislocated his shoulder in a fight with James Neal of Dallas and will be out for the year. Why was he fighting? I don’t know. However, I don’t see how you can overlook Drew Doughty in Los Angeles. Aren’t defenseman supposed to be late bloomers? Aren’t they supposed to take a while to develop? Doughty looks like he’s been in the League for five years already. He’s the Kings’ ice time leader by more than a minute. I mean, that’s unbelievable. It’s incredible. He’s been excellent despite being thrown right into the fire. I think Doughty is the guy to watch from here on out, but of course don’t take your eyes off of Columbus goalie Steve Mason either. He may struggle because of the Jackets’ defense, but Mason is the real deal.

Growing up in Northern New Jersey, have you always been a hockey fan?

Absolutely. My first hockey game I ever went to was on Feb. 28, 1988, the day before my 10th birthday, at what was then called Brendan Byrne Arena and later re-named Continental Airlines Arena. The New Jersey Devils beat the Minnesota North Stars, 8-6. It was my birthday party and it was awesome. I was already a Devils fan at the time, but after going to that game I was hooked. I went to Game 6 of the 1988 Patrick Division Semifinals at the Byrne Arena with my dad to see the Devils win the series over the Islanders with a 6-5 victory. Again, it was amazing. I remember seeing Wayne Gretzky come to town with the Los Angeles Kings. I also remember screaming a profanity his way – I was maybe 12 or 13 years old – and my mom told me to sit down and shut up. Of course, she said it in a motherly, very nice way. I grew up a Devils fan and I still root for them, but it’s a little different working in this field now. The good thing is that in my office we have a great group of hockey guys, some of which are Flyers’ fans. That sparks up a good rivalry between the Devils fans and the Flyers fans. It brings the passion for my team back. It’s great stuff.

Of all of the hockey articles you have written, which one(s) has been your favorite?

I may think I have written a lot, but then I look at guys like John Dellapina, who used to cover the Rangers for the New York Daily News and now works for the NHL as the media relations director, and Tom Gulitti of The Record (Hackensack, NJ) and I think I have a long way to go. I’ve gotten to know guys like Pierre Lebrun, Scott Burnside, Jim Matheson, Mark Spector, Dave Stubbs, etc. Those guys have done way more than me. I’m only 30 years old. I’ve got a long way to go.

However, to answer your question, I’d have to say I have a few favorites. The first article I ever wrote relating to the NHL was back in the 2002-03 season when I was still at The Record and I filled in for Tom Gulitti on a Devils’ practice. I wrote about Scott Gomez and the sports editor at the time liked it enough to give me a few more shots filling in for Tom. I ended up covering the Devils’ entire run to the 2003 Stanley Cup championship alongside Tom, traveling to Boston, Tampa, Ottawa and Anaheim. It was an incredible experience. Two more of my favorites came last season when I wrote about Alex Ovechkin, who is presently my favorite professional athlete. I wrote about Ovechkin using his late brother, Sergei, as his inspiration to get to the NHL. I also wrote about Ovechkin the day before he made his playoff debut. I was at the Kettler Capitals Iceplex for practice that Thursday morning and Alex was the first guy on the ice, taking a twirl and shooting the puck into the boards because the goals weren’t even out yet. The Zamboni was still on the ice. He was so restless. He was so ready. Those are some of my favorites, but of course covering the Winter Classic and Stanley Cup Final last year was amazing, too.

As a journalist, what are your thoughts on Bloggers being awarded press credentials?

It’s a really tough call because sometimes bloggers can do everything they do from their own couch. Sometimes there is simply no need for them to be in the locker room. It’s a muddy area, though. If a blogger is reporting the news and has established a business for himself or herself in doing so, then I think he or she has the right to be there. They have to show proof of that, though. They have to show that they aren’t just there to slam on the coach or a few players, or they aren’t just there to play favorites. That’s just not journalism, at least not good journalism, and it ruins it for us real journalists.
The Rangers credential Dubi Silverstein of Blueshirt Bulletin. I know Dubi well and he’s a great guy. What’s great about Dubi is he’s objective even though the Rangers are clearly his favorite team, and he also puts out a newsletter for fans every month. So, while he may just be blogging off the games, he is contributing in another way, too.

If a blogger is going to enhance the coverage of the team and the sport like Dubi, I’m all for it. However, that blogger has to show proof of legitimate journalism.

Do you use social media to interact with hockey fans and/or get ideas for columns?

I get e-mails all the time and I always make it a point to respond unless the e-mailer has some nasty things to say about me. That has happened on more than one occasion, believe me. So, I talk to fans via e-mail and we also have a social interacting web-site on NHL.com called NHL Connect. It’s a place for fans to talk via their own blogs. I have a blog on NHL Connect as well. Hey, I’m a fan, right? I’m not on Connect all the time, but I certainly check it out and can get pertinent information or story ideas from it. Nobody knows more about their team than the fans. They are the ones that are intimately involved with their favorite club. I need to be listening to them considering I write for them. They are my audience.

Who is your favorite hockey player of all time and why?

The guys I work with would say it’s Ovechkin, but he’s not quite there yet. He’s  close, but I’d still have to say it’s Scott Stevens for how he played the game and respected the game. If you know the story of Stevens, you know that he was a hot shot youngster with the Washington Capitals who liked to pile up the points without caring too much about how many penalty minutes came with them.

He learned over time that is not the way he was going to last a long time in this League, so when he got to New Jersey he changed with the system and became arguably the best, if not one of the best, shutdown, physical blue-liners in the history of the game. I loved his tenacity. I loved his physicality. I will always remember him crushing Slava Kozlov and then warning Dino Ciccarelli, “You’re next.” People will say his hits weren’t legal. They were. They were just really hard and really good. Eric Lindros knows.

If you could sit down for dinner and talk hockey with anyone, who would it be and why?

It wouldn’t be a player, a coach, or a manager. I would want to sit down with Mike ‘Doc’ Emrick and talk puck over a good meal. To me, there is nobody in the game with a better knowledge of its history. He’s basically an encyclopedia for names, dates, goals, games, championships, etc. I have talked hockey with Doc before, but not to the extent I would like to. He is one of the nicest men in the business and always willing to share stories. He’s seen so much from the broadcaster’s booth so to me there is no better brain to pick than his. Of course, if I wanted to talk strategy I would have said Gretzky or Scotty Bowman or Bobby Orr. I don’t want to talk strategy. I want to talk about the game, the stories within the game, the history of the game, the current state of the game, etc. Doc’s my man, plus I get to listen to his voice and that’s pretty darn cool, too.

I would personally like to thank Dan Rosen and NHL.com for thier cooperation in with this interview.  Please check out Dan’s blog on NHL Connect and his feature columns on NHL.com.

Next Page »